<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Caffeine&quot; Google Is About To Destroy Bing And Yahoo &#8211; The Market Share War Has Been Won Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielmolano.com/search-engine-optimization/caffeine-google-about-to-destroy-bing-yahoo-market-share-war-won/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielmolano.com/search-engine-optimization/caffeine-google-about-to-destroy-bing-yahoo-market-share-war-won/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.danielmolano.com/search-engine-optimization/caffeine-google-about-to-destroy-bing-yahoo-market-share-war-won/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielmolano.com/?p=1902#comment-694</guid>
		<description>Hey Daniel,

I did notice that rankings have changed.  It seems that &quot;Caffeine has been implemented.

Previously, you showed up 2nd for &quot;Business Consulting&quot;, but a search I did yesterday showed you as number 1 in the results.

I&#039;m curious, did you use your 100 backlink strategy to promote this site to its current position?  If so, what pages did you point the backlinks to?

Do they point to the home page or pages within the site?

I&#039;m in the process of testing your method, but my strategy would work best if I could have backlinks going to pages within my site but still achieve top rankings.

Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Daniel,</p>
<p>I did notice that rankings have changed.  It seems that &#034;Caffeine has been implemented.</p>
<p>Previously, you showed up 2nd for &#034;Business Consulting&#034;, but a search I did yesterday showed you as number 1 in the results.</p>
<p>I&#039;m curious, did you use your 100 backlink strategy to promote this site to its current position?  If so, what pages did you point the backlinks to?</p>
<p>Do they point to the home page or pages within the site?</p>
<p>I&#039;m in the process of testing your method, but my strategy would work best if I could have backlinks going to pages within my site but still achieve top rankings.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Molano</title>
		<link>http://www.danielmolano.com/search-engine-optimization/caffeine-google-about-to-destroy-bing-yahoo-market-share-war-won/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Molano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielmolano.com/?p=1902#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Hey Candy,

I believe Google &quot;Caffeine&quot; is under the implementation phase, but it&#039;s not fully functional yet.

As for the SEO game, the update just changes the importance of some variables within the Google algorithm as mentioned above. 

But if you have not done anything &quot;blackhat&quot; then you will be perfectly fine.

Best of luck,

- Dan Molano</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Candy,</p>
<p>I believe Google &#034;Caffeine&#034; is under the implementation phase, but it&#039;s not fully functional yet.</p>
<p>As for the SEO game, the update just changes the importance of some variables within the Google algorithm as mentioned above. </p>
<p>But if you have not done anything &#034;blackhat&#034; then you will be perfectly fine.</p>
<p>Best of luck,</p>
<p>- Dan Molano</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.danielmolano.com/search-engine-optimization/caffeine-google-about-to-destroy-bing-yahoo-market-share-war-won/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielmolano.com/?p=1902#comment-658</guid>
		<description>I just did not get it. Did Google launched Caffeine or not? You are saying they are in a process and at the same time you sad that there are some changes in search results. And how it will change the SEO &quot;game&quot; after it is done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did not get it. Did Google launched Caffeine or not? You are saying they are in a process and at the same time you sad that there are some changes in search results. And how it will change the SEO &#034;game&#034; after it is done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Molano</title>
		<link>http://www.danielmolano.com/search-engine-optimization/caffeine-google-about-to-destroy-bing-yahoo-market-share-war-won/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Molano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielmolano.com/?p=1902#comment-634</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-629&quot;&gt;Cleaning Business&lt;/a&gt;: 

I believe  Google &quot;Caffeine&quot; is under the implementation stage right now, but I&#039;m just speculating. Rankings have indeed shifted a lot since the past week. 

Some people are complaining, but my rankings have only improved.

Google and Bing apparently share similar algorithms, which is precisely why rankings are good on both.

Yahoo has weird search results, they don&#039;t match with those of Google or Bing at all. 

Which is also precisely why it&#039;s falling behind in the game (soon to be surpassed by Bing in market share).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-629">Cleaning Business</a>: </p>
<p>I believe  Google &#034;Caffeine&#034; is under the implementation stage right now, but I&#039;m just speculating. Rankings have indeed shifted a lot since the past week. </p>
<p>Some people are complaining, but my rankings have only improved.</p>
<p>Google and Bing apparently share similar algorithms, which is precisely why rankings are good on both.</p>
<p>Yahoo has weird search results, they don&#039;t match with those of Google or Bing at all. </p>
<p>Which is also precisely why it&#039;s falling behind in the game (soon to be surpassed by Bing in market share).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
